CLOSE THE BASE is brought to you by the Institute for Policy Studies: Ideas into Action for Peace, Justice, and the Environment.
About the CampaignWe support the unconditional closure of the U.S. Marine Corps base at Futenma and oppose the construction of other U.S. bases in Okinawa. (read more)
@CloseTheBase: Japanese Nuclear Bombing radiation survivors & Vietnamese Agent Orange survivors witness for "Peace through... http://t.co/kGruRsAn
31 months ago from Facebook
@CloseTheBase: This photo is from Network for Okinawa member Peace Boat's most recent voyage that included Agent Orange... http://t.co/PW3nRpN1
31 months ago from Facebook
@CloseTheBase: ""Save Life Society" was formed by the elders mostly in their 80's and 90's to prevent construction of the... http://t.co/lz619J8I
31 months ago from Facebook
TagsAmerican Friends Service Committee Ann Wright April 25, 2010 Rally biodiversity Carl Levin Center for Biological Diversity Chalmers Johnson democracy Democratic Party of Japan Doug Bandow dugong Fellowship of Reconciliation films Foreign Policy in Focus Futenma Gavan McCormack Global Day of Action on Military Spending (GDAMS) Governor Nakaima Goya Guam Hatoyama Henoko human rights Institute for Policy Studies Japan-U.S. Citizens for Okinawa (JUCON) Jim Webb John Feffer Jon Mitchell lawsuits Maher Affair military spending Nago Network for Okinawa Obama Okinawa Satoko Norimatsu Save the Dugong Campaign Center Susumu Inamine Sympathy Budget Takae The Asia Pacific Journal U.S. military accidents & crimes V-22 Osprey WaPo advertisement Yanbaru Forest
Monthly Archives: October 2011
October 27, 2011 by CTB Team
In “Futenma: Tip of the Iceberg in Okinawa’s Agony," his latest article for The Asia-Pacific Journal, University of the Ryukyus Professor Emeritus Yoshio Shimoji focuses on the root of Okinawan resentment against U.S. military bases on their islands: The U.S. violated human rights and property rights under international law when the U.S. military seized Okinawan property by force to make way for U.S. bases. Shimoji details how U.S. bases in Okinawa were established by "land requisitions...executed at bayonet-point and by bulldozer, leveling houses and destroying farms in the face of protesting farmers, mothers, children and their supporters." He adds: "...the U.S. military seized the land in clear violation of Article 46 of The Hague Convention, which states: 'Family honor and rights, the lives of persons, and private property, as well as religious convictions and practice, must be respected. Private property cannot be confiscated.' "There are presently more than 3,000 so-called “military base landowners” for Futenma Air Base alone and more than 40,000 for all bases and installations in Okinawa. " Shimoji's conclusion: "The U.S. violated international law when its military encroached upon private lands with impunity and built the base. On what legal and moral basis, then, can it demand its replacement?"
October 23, 2011 by CTB Team
In "Discordant Visitors: Japanese and Okinawan Messages to the US," Satoko Norimatsu and Gavan McCormack quote Governor Nakaima's September 2011 speech at George Washington University in their commentary on the bizarre incongruity between official Japanese and Okinawan prefectural stances on the U.S. military's proposed destruction of Oura Bay and Henoko to make way for a U.S. mega-military base. Opposed by Okinawan civil society and global environmentalists since 1996, the U.S. base proposal follows a historical pattern of violently and undemocratically established U.S. military bases in Okinawa prefecture. During and after the Battle of Okinawa, U.S. soldiers seized Okinawan property (and imprisoned the owners in camps) to make way for bases to support Operation Downfall, the planned invasion of Japan. When that plan was abandoned, Okinawans were kept imprisoned while U.S. soldiers transformed the bases into permanent bases. In the 1950's, U.S. marines (by use of "bayonets and bulldozers") seized private property by dragging Okinawan women and children from homes and destroying farms and livestock to make way for more U.S. bases. Despite Okinawan protests dating back to the end of the World War II, the U.S. government has refused to remove unwanted military bases from Okinawa. In recent years, the Okinawan movement has garnered worldwide attention, with some observers comparing the Okinawan struggle for human rights and democracy to movements in Eastern and Central Europe during Soviet military rule, before Glastnost. Since the 3/11 Triple Disaster, Japanese citizen "tomodachi" appeals to Washington to forego costly military subsidization by Japanese taxpapers have grown more urgent. Although U.S. congressional leaders have responded to Okinawan and Japanese calls for "change"; thus far the Obama administration has ignored requests to rein in U.S. military demands for Japanese taxpayer subsidization of proposed new base construction in Okinawa, Guam, the Japanese mainland, and continued "sympathy" subsidies to the U.S. military. In September, Okinawa Govenor Nakaima, in conjunction with an Okinawan ad campaign in The New York Times, stated his case directly to Americans in Washington, D.C. Norimatsu and McCormack explain: "Nakaima declared that opposition in Okinawa to the Okinawan base project was almost total. He spoke of the unanimous declaration within the prefectural parliament (the Prefectural Assembly), and the explicit opposition of all 41 local government mayors and heads, including the mayor of the city of Nago, the designated site for the new base. Nakaima told his Washington audience that the relocation plan 'must be revised,' continuing that Futenma was 'not an acceptable option' and that if the national government was to choose to proceed 'against the will of the local citizens,' it might lead to 'an irreparable rift … between the people of Okinawa and the US forces in the prefecture.'”